Preparing for the Holiday Season: How to Enjoy without Over-Indulging

Holidays are a high-pressure time for people trying to monitor their intake.

Trust me, I get it — we spend the next two months piling our plates with a scoop of everything, wash it down with cocktails all night, and top it all off with desserts, and since we wait all year for these celebrations, we want to enjoy every minute!

My first piece of advice is usually this: Cut yourself some slack, it’s a holiday! If you truly eat whatever you’d like on a day like Thanksgiving, that is 100% okay. Your lifestyle is built upon your everyday choices, and one day of splurges is not going to topple any progress you’ve been making.

If you’d like some actual tips on how to make the holidays healthier, however, that’s also reasonable. Nutrition is largely mental, and if a free-for-all eating day is going to set you back or open up a whole season of overeating, then try these tips:

  1. Focus on your fruits and veggies. Nutrients matter, so even if you’re having a particularly high calorie day, try to make sure you’re getting vitamins, minerals, and fiber from plant foods! More decadent dishes like sweet potatoes with marshmallows or green been casserole will have added empty calories from the toppings, so try to scoop more veggies but less topping to cut a bit of the calories. Overall, though, eating a plate that is 50% veggie casserole is still healthier than one that is 50% macaroni and cheese.
  2. Try not to drink your calories. This is a huge factor to the holiday season weight gain! Light beers run around 100 calories, while heavier winter lagers are closer to 200. Seasonal craft cocktails can easily be close to 200 as well, especially as you add in sweet juices. You can still enjoy your drinks, but try to limit the number and type to keep the empty calories under control.
  3. Remember you can eat everything – just not in one day! It’s the holiday SEASON, so remember that there will be ample opportunity to enjoy your favorite dishes (whether it’s pie or twice baked potatoes or tasty drinks) throughout the next few months. Definitely enjoy the special items around you, especially if they’re homemade by loved ones, but remember that you don’t have to have it all at one sitting. Listen to your hunger cues and stop when you’re full so you avoid the post-meal guilt. Ask to take a slice of something else for the road if you won’t get a chance to eat it again, and enjoy it tomorrow. This will let you savor all your favorite flavors but spread the calories out over time.

I recently commented on this for a Prevention piece on how to save calories at Thanksgiving (check it out here), and I’m sure there will be many more helpful articles to come this season! Remember that your nutrition journey is not built in a day, and it certainly won’t be wrecked by a day either. Enjoy the things around you, try to eat mindfully, and continue focusing on the big picture of making overall healthy choices whenever possible– that will be a win in my book!

Why Your Diet Doesn’t Work: The Imprecise Science of Caloric Balance

“Want to lose one pound of fat? Just cut 500 calories from your diet each day and you’ll shed one pound per week!” We’ve all heard that sensationalized claim before, and if it sounds a bit too good to be true, that’s because it is. This math is based on the premise that it takes exactly 3500 calories to burn one pound of fact, but that information itself is inherently flawed.

Weight maintenance is essentially a function of our basal metabolic rate, or BMR: the amount of calories your body burns daily just to survive. Just like it takes more energy to power larger machinery, it takes more calories to feed all of the cells in larger or heavier people– so they naturally have higher BMRs. If you were to lie in bed for 24 hours without any activity or intake, after fasting for at least 10 hours, your BMR is the number of calories your body would burn.

We can estimate our BMR with equations like the Harris-Benedict and Mifflin St Jeor equations, which take your height, weight, age, and gender into account. If you’ve ever tried to calculate your calorie needs online or via app, they probably use these equations.

The only way to actually measure your BMR, though, is through ‘calorimetry‘ (which literally means ‘calorie measurement’); direct calorimetry requires you to stand in a specialized chamber that measures how much heat your body is producing (impractical for most people), and indirect calorimetry can use respiratory tests to measure how much oxygen you inhale and carbon dioxide you exhale over a set period of time (somewhat more practical and actually available at some fitness and medical centers).

Of course we don’t just lie in bed all day. When we factor in our daily activities, we can find our Total Energy Expenditure (TEE), which means how many calories you burn on a typical day doing your usual activities. This is about 20% higher than your BMR if you are mostly sedentary to up to 90% higher if you are a professional athlete. Most people who are moderately active (1-3 days of intentional physical activity or exercise) burn about 38% more calories than their BMR.

This is where the error happens: It is very difficult to know how many calories you truly burn in a day. According to predictive equations, as a 5’4″, 27-year-old, mildly active, average weight female, my estimated BMR ranges from 1360 calories (Mifflin Jeor) to 1430 calories (Harris-Benedict), and my TEE should be about 1630 – 1720 calories daily.   I actually had indirect calorimetry done at a local gym last year, however, and my results showed that a better estimate for my BMR is 1123 calories and my TEE is close to 1350 calories.

That’s about 20% fewer calories fewer than traditional estimates- meaning that my body needs way fewer calories than the textbooks tell me.

Moving onto the second major issue: the 3500-calorie rule just doesn’t seem to be true.

This number came from a 1950s study by Max Wishnofky called “Calorie Equivalents of Gained or Lost Weight,” which posits that one pound of fat would require about 3500  calories to burn based on the scientific principles of fat. (If you’re interested in the gritty details: 1 pound (454 grams) of fat cells contains about 87% actual fat, and since it takes about 9 calories to burn one gram of fat, than a whole whole pound (454 grams) should burn up using about 3700 calories).  If you took a literal pound of fat and threw it into an incinerator to measure how much energy was required to literally burn it, that might be accurate. However, it doesn’t take our physiology into effect, and for better or for worse, our bodies are extremely adaptive at trying to preserve our energy stores.

Wishnofsky also examined a 1930s study by Strange, McCluggage, and Evans (“Further studies in the dietary correction of obesity”) which essentially starved for weight loss and found that they lost 0.6 pounds per day with a 2100 calorie deficit. How would one have such a severe deficit, you ask? They were put on a 360 calorie diet.

  • The diet: 360 calories made up of lean steak, fish, egg whites, whole milk, orange juice, yeast, minimal vegetables, and salt contributing ~58 grams of protein, 14 grams of carbohydrates, and 8 grams of fat each day. By today’s medical standards this would be a study of intentionally invoking severe malnutrition.
  • The participants: only 13 patients participated, and they were all in a hospital setting. Their weight ranged from 180 pounds to 427 pounds at the start of the study.
  • The outcomes: everyone obviously lost weight – the average was 35 pounds over 59 days. This was VERY inconsistent, though: actual weight loss ranged from 5 pounds over 8 days to 104 pounds over 176 days. 

This very small data pool based on a severe starvation diet showed that people lost about 0.6 pounds with a 2100 calorie deficit each day – making the weight loss ratio 1 pound to every 3500 calories. The 3500 calorie rule is based on these 13 people, severe starved for anywhere from a week to 25 weeks. 

I think this just exposes a truth we all know deep down inside: it’s just not that simple. Reviews of studies indicate that we lose weight more slowly than the rule would predict because our body burns fewer and fewer calories as we lose pounds. If you’ve ever watched a season of The Biggest Loser, you’ve seen this reality in action. Contestants used to lose over 20 pounds per week in the beginning when they were larger and had more excess weight to lose, but by the final weeks, they were following severe diets and working out 10 hours per day only to lose 2 – 3 pounds per week. Over time, their bodies required fewer calorie per day to run, so that calorie deficit rule shifted for them.

The good news is that researchers are now starting to battle this well-known rule to promote more realistic weight loss attempts. Dr. Diana Thomas and colleagues are leading this crusade with a math-driven approach, modeling actual weight loss journeys to create calorie / weight loss curves showing significantly less weight loss than the 3500 calorie rule predicts. Though many weight loss apps still use standard formulas to calculate how many calories you need per day for weight loss, a much more sustainable method would be to try to improve the overall quality of your diet, monitor what you currently eat and try to implement a slight deficit, increase your physical activity, and adjust things your plan as you go.

There is one slight upside to the 3500 rule, which is that it is memorable enough to communicate that caloric deficit is needed to burns weight. The downside is that it dramatically overestimates the rate of weight loss and can inspire dangerous levels of calorie cutting. I would never recommend eating less than 1200 calories; crash diets slow down your metabolism as your body adapts quickly to its new low-energy state, and nearly everyone rebounds back to a poor higher-calorie diet later on. Emphasizing overall nutrition quality, seeking a registered dietitian for ongoing nutrition counseling and support, and focusing on nutrition as a health goal rather than a means to an end can help you actually achieve your goals and maintain them long-term.

 

The overall takeaway:

  1. It is difficult to calculate your accurate BMR.
  2. It is even harder to then calculate your TEE
  3. Even if you can figure out how many calories you need daily, it is difficult to know how steep of a calorie deficit you would need to burn 1 pound of fat as the 3500 calorie rule is unreliable and based on absolutely extremist, insufficient research.
  4. Focus on improving diet quality, achieving a mild but sustainable caloric deficit, and seek assistance from a nutrition professional if you feel lost!

 

 

Resources:

Wishnofsky M.  Caloric equivalents of gained or lost weight. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1958 Sep-Oct; 6(5):542-6.

Strang JM, McCluggage HB, Evans FA. Further studies in the dietary correction of obesity. American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 1930;179(5):687–693.

Thomas DM, Gonzalez MC, Pereira AZ, Redman LM, Heymsfield SB. Time to Correctly Predict the Amount of Weight Loss with Dieting.  Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2014;114(6):857-861.

Is Your Food Dangerous? Top Food Safety Tips You Might Not Be Doing

We often take food safety for granted and assume that everything we buy is likely fine to eat until a predetermined expiration date, but the truth is that some foods have far higher risk of spreading foodborne illness.

Anyone with a weakened immune system, including children, the elderly, or anyone taking immunosuppressants or undergoing chemotherapy is at a particularly high risk of catching a foodborne illness, but even generally healthy individuals at at risk with certain foods or poorly prepared dishes.

My top 5 tips for ensuring your food is safe:

  1. Read about Recalls: Rely on trustworthy sources like FoodSafety.gov for recall information! This is a phenomenal way to stay updated about any foods that may have been tainted before they reach your kitchen. While many major recalls make headlines, smaller recalls can slip by under the radar, so FoodSafety.gov’s information can help you protect yourself.
  2. Choose Pasteurization: Always choose pasteurized goods including milk, cheeses, and fruit juices as the pasteurization method kills dangerous bacteria
  3. Avoid undercooked meat: Even though rare hamburgers and raw tuna taste like delicacies, many bacteria thrive at temperatures under 165 degrees Fahrenheit, so foods need to be well cooked to ensure safety.
  4. Take caution at buffets and salad bars: the huge selection can be tempting, but food that sits out without proper heating or cooling puts you at major risk of foodborne illness. If your hot food seems cooler than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or your cold salad bar items seem warmer than 40 degrees, bacteria can be growing all day long. Look for trustworthy locations where you see employees checking temperatures and bringing fresh trays out often. Also keep an eye out for servingware that falls into any serving dishes, carrying bacteria from whomever touched it last.
  5. Use your Judgment for Sell-By Dates: That beloved Sell By date on your package is only a guideline used by retailers to know when products are generally safe or should be tossed:

“Sell-By” dates are a guide for retailers. Although many products bear “Sell-By” dates, product dating is not a Federal requirement. While these dates are helpful to the retailer, they are reliable only if the food has been kept at a safe temperature during storage and handling.

— USDA Food Safety and Inspection Services

If a product was stored at an unsafe temperature at any time, that date is no longer a good estimate of how long the product will keep, so always evaluate your food carefully; if there is a change in odor or consistency, it may be a sign of spoilage. Also note that most refrigerated products should be used within 7-10 days of opening, so don’t keep your opened sour cream or salad dressing for 2 months just because the Sell By date hasn’t yet arrived!

Check out this article by Healthy Way featuring some foods that are particularly risky with input from a food safety professional as well as my recommendations for alternative options!

 

 

 

Dietitian-Approved Lower-Carb Breakfasts (Yes, they exist, and No, it’s not just eggs!)

Breakfast is the golden meal for many Americans, but one of the biggest complaints I hear is that our iconic breakfast foods are packed with carbohydrates. It’s a valid point: pancakes, waffles, cinnamon buns, croissants, coffee extra light and extra sweet, sugary cereals, grab-and-go granola bars… Your morning meal can easily turn into a landslide of sugar.

But let’s take a step back – don’t get frustrated and skip breakfast!  The word breakfast comes from breaking fast — it is a chance for your body to get some actual external energy to help fuel your day. Without it, your body will rely on your energy stores from the night before and, if those run too low, you may be sluggish and sleepy.

img_20181014_101240373

Kodiak pancakes (they’re made with extra protein and whole grains) plus fresh berries and a drizzle of syrup (about 1 tsp) – my go-to weekend breakfast

Research stands behind breakfast as an important part of your routine (check out the links throughout this article for the original studies). Consistent breakfast intake has been linked to maintaining weight loss and higher levels of a hormone called Peptide YY which helps decrease appetite and intake.

Skipping breakfast, however, may lead to higher blood sugar spikes at your next meal, insulin resistance, and larger intake later in the day- which major implications for anyone with diabetes!

The actual foods that you eat for breakfast also play a big role in how hungry you are later as well as how high your blood sugar will go:

Higher protein / lower carbohydrate breakfasts have also linked to lower blood sugar after breakfast). Choosing lower Glycemic Index (GI) foods — foods that impact your blood sugar less drastically — can help you predict your blood sugar response even more than the just carbohydrates counting alone (study here), which supports the choice of whole grains and high-fiber foods rather than refined sugars.  A clinical trial also supported Low Glycemic Index / High Fiber breakfast combinations as they led to lower blood sugar spikes and less required insulin than High Glycemic Index / Low Fiber breakfasts (think high in refined grains and sugar). For more info on glycemic index, check out my break down.

Okay- so what can I eat?!

I generally recommend around 30 grams of carbohydrates with breakfast, which should provide you with some wonderful energy without spiking your blood sugar too much.

Try any of these combinations to get a moderate amount of carbohydrates, adequate protein, and healthy fats:

  • 1 slice whole grain toast + 1 tablespoon almond / peanut / sunflower seed butter + 1/2 cup fresh berries
  • 1 cup cooked plain oatmeal + 1 tsp maple syrup + 1 tsp cinnamon + 2 Tablespoons of walnuts or almonds
  • 1 whole wheat pancake + 1 tsp light butter + 1 tsp maple syrup + 2 links turkey bacon or sausage (~1 oz)
  • 1 piece whole wheat toast + scrambled egg mix (Mix 1 egg + 3 egg whites together, or 1/4 cup liquid whites alone) scrambled with 1/2 cup chopped veggies.
  • 1 whole wheat mini bagel + 2 tablespoons whipped cream cheese + 1 piece of fruit
  • 1 6-oz flavored Greek yogurt + 1 tsp of flax seeds + 1 Tablespoon sliced almonds
  • 3/4 cup bran flakes + 1 cup skim milk + 2 tablespoons of diced prunes or raisins
  • 3/4 cup cooked grits + 1/2 oz low fat cheese mixed in + 1 egg
  • 6 ounces plain yogurt + 1 tsp honey + 1/2 cup berries + 4 oz almond milk – blend for smoothie
  • 1 slice whole wheat toast + 1/2 sliced avocado (trendy but also healthy!)
  • 1/2 cup part skim ricotta + 1 tsp honey drizzled + 1/4 cup berries + 1 Tablespoon sliced almonds
  • 1 small apple + 1.5 Tablespoon almond butter 

If you have diabetes, you may want to substitute sugar-free syrup to minimize blood sugar spikes. For others, though, small portions of these items can still fit into a well rounded diet.

Bonus Round: Frozen Breakfasts

Are you used to grabbing something from your freezer before you hit the road each morning? Sometimes convenience is king, so I’d rather see you stock your freezer with healthy breakfast options than grab something high fat and high calorie from a fast food joint on the go. These are some of my top healthy options from the freezer aisle:

My main caution with frozen items is that they tend to have a ton of added sodium, so you may want to avoid these options if you are prone to hypertension. It’s also wise to eat lower sodium foods during the rest of the day if you rely on these quick and convenient breakfasts.  When looking at other options, I recommend avoiding anything with a croissant, biscuit, or texas toast (they tend to be both high fat and high carb). Anything made with whole grains, egg whites, and veggies is usually a decent option. If you’re choosing something with a breakfast meat, turkey bacon and sausage are leaner but higher in salt; bacon and regular sausage are higher in saturated fat.

Whichever breakfast option works best for you, remember to try to combine high quality carbohydrates from fruits, grains, and veggies along with lean protein and you’ll be setting yourself up for success! Choose one option here and make it your mission to try it out this week.

If you’re looking for more personalized nutrition advice, contact me for an appointment!

Always read the ingredients!

Are your foods what you THINk they are?

Healthy Way recently published a great piece about foods that aren’t quite what we think. From pancake syrup to wasabi to bacon bits, the food industry often brands products based on how we perceive them rather than the actual ingredients.

The best way to keep yourself informed is to read ingredient lists as much as possible. This will show you if you’re eating maple syrup or maple flavored corn syrup (yes, that’s what many generic ‘table syrups’ really are).

Our owner Kelsey is quoted discussing some of the secrets of instant oatmeal so take a look at the article on Healthy Way!

A new study links the Mediterranean Diet to lower risk of Macular Degeneration

A new article in the journal Ophthalmology examined the diets and health outcomes of almost 5,000 participants who recorded their eating habits and wellness outcomes over several years. After analyzing the group’s food frequency questionnaires (which help paint a picture of what foods people tend to eat frequently or avoid), the researchers found that those following a Mediterranean-style diet had a 41% lower chance of developing macular degeneration.

The most interesting finding that that no single element of the Mediterranean diet correlated strongly to risk of macular degeneration, which implies that the protection came from the diet as a whole rather than any one portion. The Mediterranean diet is rich in fruits and vegetables, high in fiber with whole grains and legume consumption, and full of healthy unsaturated fats from plant oils, nuts, and fatty fish, while meat can be consumed in small amounts. These elements combine to help fuel your body and protect you from cellular damage. Adhering to this diet has been linked to cardiovascular health and lower risk of cancer, as well. To learn more about the components of a Mediterranean diet, check out these sources:

Bonus reading: Visit this summary from The Olive Oil Times to see The Peoples Plate featured as a nutrition professional commentator on the study’s findings!

Fall Flavors: Acorn Squash

Fall weather calls for fall flavors! Here in New Jersey, the temperature has dropped and it’s officially time for comfort foods. Instead of making a heavy high-fat dish, try to capitalize on fresher fall flavors that pair well with other seasonal flavors. I recently made a sweet spaghetti squash and wanted to try a savory spin on a different autumn classic: Acorn squash.

I have to admit that this was a first for me! I love eating squash, but it wasn’t a kitchen staple for me until this year. I am a busy, health-conscious home cook, so I look for three things when food shopping:

  1. It has to be easy! If there are too many steps, the odds of me making it after a long day at work drop significantly. If I know I can throw it together in under 15 or 20 minutes, it makes the cut.
  2. It has to be healthy! My body and wellness matter to me, so I want to know that my meals are nourishing.
  3. It has to be delicious! I am a foodie through and through, so if it doesn’t taste good, why bother making it? Sure, I want my food to be nutritious, but I also want to crave it again and again.

img_20181015_190856659-01-e1539825224401.jpeg

This recipe hits all of the sweet spots and brings fall to your table:

  1. Cut the squash in half and pierce the skin a few times. You can cut piece off of the bottom to create a flat surface so the squash can rest steadily when placed open-face up
  2. Scoop out the inner seeds and pulp.
  3. Coat with olive oil, pepper, and a little salt. You can also try other herbs like garlic or onion powder, thyme, sage, or rosemary.
  4. Roast at 350 degrees F for about 45 minutes, or until fork tender.

My favorite thing about squash is that it is high in fiber (5 grams per half cup) which not only keeps you full but is linked to lower blood sugar spikes and to intestinal health, has healthy complex carbs (a half cup has about 15 grams, which is equal to one carb exchange for carb counters), and is filling with very little calories (about 60 for a half-cup serving).

Feeling fancy? The shape of an acorn squash is perfect for stuffing!  Try adding any of the following to elevate this squash from a side to a main feature:

  • Quinoa cooked with orange juice, topped with toasted almonds
  • Farro tossed with olive oil and craisins
  • 2 oz of crumbled lean turkey sausage with sauteed onions
  • Top with sliced pork medallions

 

 

Remember to follow The Peoples Plate for more recipes or for personalized nutrition counseling! What is your favorite fall ingredient?

Is the Glycemic Index the secret to better blood sugar control?

“Glycemic Index” and “Glycemic Load” have become buzzwords for the carbohydrate-conscious public, but the burning question remains: What exactly is Glycemic Index?  Is it worth learning in an effort to control your blood sugar? How is it even different than counting carbs?

Counting carbohydrates will tell you just how many grams of carbs you are getting with each meal, but not all carbs break down in our body the same; some are made of longer-chain molecules or are higher in fiber and take longer for your body to break down. Simpler sugars tend to be digested and absorbed much more quickly, which leads to a more rapid blood sugar spike. Carbohydrate counting along does not provide that kind of information, but Glycemic Index does.

Glycemic Index (GI) measures how a 50 gram serving of a specific food will impact your blood sugar overall. It takes into account both how high your blood sugar will spike as well as how how long it takes for it to return to normal, and it summarizes this overall glycemic effect as a number on a scale from 0 to 100. Pure glucose has a GI score of 100, as a reference point, so lower scores mean a lower blood sugar response:

Low GI: 55 or less
Medium GI: 56-69
High GI: 70 or higher

The mortal flaw of GI, however, is that is is so incredibly variable that it is difficult to actually trust any specific number. Just take a look at the extensive table (over 55 pages long) found in the journal Diabetes Cares, which lists GI data for items based on a huge range of sources. Brown rice is listed multiple times with the GI ranging from 50 to 87— which obviously complicates the idea that we can quantify exactly how your blood sugar will react to 50 grams of brown rice.  Tufts University recently studied glycemic response within individuals by measuring people’s unique blood sugar response to doses of glucose and white bread, and they found that a person’s blood sugar response varied by 20-25% at different times. This study is important in showing that Glycemic Index isn’t as precise as we’d like, though it provides a good ballpark for you.

Reference this abbreviated table from Harvard University which is based on an American Diabetes Association article that looked at GI as an average of multiple valid studies – this average is likely the most accurate you’ll find.

One major issue is that eating a large volume of a low-GI item can be worse than eating a little bit of a high-GI food. This is because GI measures the impact of 50 grams of an item, so you can only compare the GI of (for example) table sugar (GI 60) and watermelon (GI 72) if you assume you are eating 50 grams of each. Hopefully, you don’t actually eat the same amount of straight sugar and watermelon, so the GI comparison is deceitful. This is where Glycemic Load (GL) comes into play. The GL applies GI concepts to actual realistic portion sizes to help you gauge how your intake will really impact your blood sugar, so you can see that the glycemic load of ~2 teaspoons of sugar (approximately 6) is higher than that of a 4 ounce portion of watermelon (GL of approximately 4).

Again, all Glycemic Load data is based on Glycemic Index, so you need to keep some flexibility in mind when using this information for food choice.

Glycemic Index also varies based on a number of different food qualities; the GI will be higher in foods that are riper, cooked longer, or processed into a finer / easier to digest product (like quick oats as opposed to rolled oats). Even once you have a good estimate of an accurate GI score, the combination of foods in a meal will change how your body responds because fat, protein, and fiber all slow digestion and therefore blood sugar spikes.

So what’s the verdict?

There is mixed research about Glycemic Index (GI) and Glycemic Load (GL) in terms of how helpful it can be for actual blood sugar control. Some studies have found no link to improved blood sugar at all, but a Cochrane Review of glycemic index examined the literature and found that lower-GI diets are linked to better blood sugar control when you consider all of the data together.

My takeaway is that understanding the glycemic impact of food can be a helpful reference tool but is too variable to rely on entirely. It may help you understand how different types of foods might impact your blood sugar, and it’s great for comparing similar items and to see which types of foods lead to a better glycemic response. The result will likely be that you’ll see the benefit of foods that are higher in fiber, less processed, lower in simple sugars, and higher in protein – which is the same generally healthy carbohydrate-consistent diet I would recommend in the first place.

Here is a summary of some major Glycemic Index numbers to consider.
Remember, this is Glycemic Index, so it does not take portion size into account, and these numbers have a big error range so assume they can be about 10 points higher or lower.  This information tells you how these items MIGHT impact your blood sugar ON AVERAGE if you consumed IDENTICAL PORTIONS of each.  Use this more for reference between similar items with a fixed portion. Should you necessarily avoid high GI foods like watermelon and potatoes all together? No! Just monitor your portion sizes and eat them with higher protein / fiber / fat foods to help slow digestion.

  • High GI: 70 or higher
    • Corn flakes (~81)
    • Puffed rice cereal (~82)
    • Instant potatoes (~80)
    • Instant oats (~79)
    • Potato, boiled (~78)
    • Watermelon (~76)
    • White bread (~75)
    • Cheerios (~74)
    • White Rice (~73)
    • Bagel (~72)
  • Medium GI: 56-69
    • Brown Rice (~68)
    • Popcorn (~65)
    • Table sugar (~65)
    • Sweet potato (~63)
    • Honey (~61)
    • Pineapple (~59)
    • Muesli (~57)
    • Plantain (~55)
  • Low GI: 55 or less
    • Sourdough bread (~54)
    • Rice noodles (~53)
    • Stone ground or pumpernickel bread (<55 per the American Diabetes Association)
    • Rolled oats (~55)
    • Corn (~52)
    • Banana (~51)
    • Spaghetti (~49)
    • Corn tortilla (~46)
    • Canned peaches (~43)
    • Oranges (~43)
    • Grapes (~43)
    • Fruited Yogurt (~51)
    • Milk (~39)
    • Apple (~36)
    • Lentils (~32)
    • Chickpeas (~29)
    • Under 20: Eggplant, broccoli, raw carrots, cauliflower, mushrooms, lettuce, red peppers, onions,  tomatoes

There are several Glycemic Index apps to help you keep this information in your pocket if you’re interested in learning more, though keep in mind that the numbers will always be estimates and you may find very different guidelines based on what the app references.

I also recommend the following resources and articles:

 

If you’d like to pursue more personalized counseling, contact us for information about in-person or virtual sessions!

Share your thoughts on Glycemic Index below – I’d love to hear your experience with this, whether you found it helpful, confusing, interesting, too restrictive, or otherwise!